Nicolas Kicker vs David Jorda Sanchis Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 10 Nov at 07:49 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Kicker vs D. Jorda Sanchis

ARG
0
Win
Played
1
Win

ESP
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Kicker 0 - 1 Sanchis
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kicker | 0 |
| Sanchis | 1 |
Last 0 H2H Matches:
No past h2h happened.
N. Kicker vs D. J. Sanchis H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $521,720 | Career Prize Money | $13,270 |
| 59.28% (409-281) | Career Total W/L | 55.54% (321-257) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 18 | Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
N. Kicker vs D. J. Sanchis Match Preview:
- Second Serve Success: Nicolas Kicker's recent performance shows he wins 44.92% of points on his second serve, slightly better than David Jorda Sanchis's 43.76%. Could this give Kicker the edge in tighter serves?
- Return Game Edge: Kicker excels in returning second serves, winning 47.79% of such points, compared to Sanchis's 45.00%. This stronger return might influence the match outcome.
- First Serve Return: On first serve returns, Kicker also leads with 30.39% over Sanchis's 28.68%, indicating a minor advantage.
- Handling Pressure: Both players are close in saving breakpoints, with Kicker at 51.03% and Sanchis at 49.75%. This resilience might be key during crucial points.
- Overall Performance: Kicker has a higher match win rate of 63.41% in the past year, compared to Sanchis's 55.88%. Does this showcase Kicker's consistency?
- Surface Competence: Both players thrive on clay with a win rate of 61%, suggesting a level playing field on this surface.
- Tournament Level: Kicker has slightly better recent success on Challenger/ITF circuits, winning 61.54% of his matches, compared to Sanchis's 56.52%.
- Opponent Strength: Over the last year, Sanchis has faced slightly tougher opponents, with an average rank of 414.54 versus Kicker’s 430.38.
- Deciding Sets: Kicker is marginally more successful in deciding sets, with a win rate of 63% compared to Sanchis's 60%.
- Break Point Conversion: Kicker converts breakpoints at a rate of 33.46%, slightly outperforming Sanchis's 32.31% efficiency.
Editorial Prediction (November 10, 2025, UTC):
Nicolas Kicker demonstrates slight advantages in several crucial performance areas, particularly in second serve performance and return games. These metrics often correlate to match success and suggest Kicker's potential to outperform his opponent.
Furthermore, Kicker's higher overall win percentage and efficiency in deciding sets may give him the upper hand during closely contested points. Analyzing surface performance, both players are evenly matched on clay; however, Kicker's broader match success indicates potential for consistency and resilience.
While David Jorda Sanchis has faced tougher opponents, Kicker's statistical edge in key metrics makes him the likely favorite to triumph in the upcoming match.
Considering these factors, Nicolas Kicker is expected to win this upcoming tennis match, leveraging his slightly superior form and match-play strengths.
Nicolas Kicker vs David Jorda Sanchis Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Kicker vs D. J. Sanchis H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 8 | Games Won | 13 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:41:15 | Average Match Time | 1:41:15 |
| 71% (46/65) | 1st Serve % | 59% (38/64) |
| 48% (22/46) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (25/38) |
| 53% (10/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (12/26) |
| 75% (3/4) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (5/5) |
| 42% (27/64) | Return Points Win % | 51% (33/65) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
N. Kicker Recent Matches Played
D. J. Sanchis Recent Matches Played

N. Kicker vs D. J. Sanchis Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.28% (409/281) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.54% (321/257) |
| 57.35% (929/691) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.36% (710/596) |
| 53.11% (7984/7050) | Games Win/Loss | 52.45% (6446/5844) |
| 53.03% (35/31) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.17% (89/64) |
| 60.45% (373/244) | Clay Win/Loss | 58.26% (208/149) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 35.82% (24/43) |
| 16.67% (1/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
| 750 | Aces Total | 1768 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1058 | Total Double Faults | 1315 |
| 1:15:23 | Average Match Time | 1:12:53 |
| 535.94 | Average Opponent Rank | 418.67 |
| 65% (21681/33170) | 1st Serve % | 59% (16410/27964) |
| 65% (14201/21681) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (11399/16410) |
| 52% (5925/11489) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (5518/11553) |
| 44% (1599/3655) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1197/2769) |
| 42% (14103/33812) | Return Points Win % | 40% (11248/28098) |
| 26.92% (7/19) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 46.15% (6/7) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45.16% (28/34) | Main Tour W/L | 30.00% (3/7) |
| 58.46% (190/135) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (66/66) |
| 67.68% (178/85) | Futures W/L | 57.80% (252/184) |
| 59% (401/675) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (314/567) |
| 46% (6/13) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 54% (100/186) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (76/153) |
| 53% (119/225) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (84/157) |
| 85% (407/345) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (295/266) |
| 15% (407/61) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (295/27) |
| 22% (283/63) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (282/53) |